The woman on the phone told me to send in an email for a clearer explanation. I'll do that.
I think how they're trying to sidestep the issue - assuming there is one (and I think there is) - is simply by directing the tax on to the property and not the people living in it. That's fine, but why bother with all those 'disregarded people' who are 'exempt'? I know this helps to describe the type of property but it seems unsuccessful in its very purpose.
I think how they're trying to sidestep the issue - assuming there is one (and I think there is) - is simply by directing the tax on to the property and not the people living in it. That's fine, but why bother with all those 'disregarded people' who are 'exempt'? I know this helps to describe the type of property but it seems unsuccessful in its very purpose.