[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/session.php on line 585: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/session.php on line 641: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
Carers UK Forum • To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality - Page 11
Page 11 of 11

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:47 pm
by sunnydisposition
Does this apply to you...

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/pen ... 2PNcU9-qAA

Two women handed payouts totalling £14,000 after state pension blunder went unnoticed for years: Are YOU being underpaid? Find out here...

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 5:53 pm
by Huegatort
My last e-mail from Backto60: below

To #Waspi & All groups calling for 'Crumbs' based on the false premise you represent 3.8m #50sWomen

Live litigation at Appeal Court via @NexusChambers
Michael Mansfield QC cannot be usurped by yourselves nor anyone.

Back off selling women short without authority.

Why, more than ever, Backto60. com 's World Class Legal Team were right to challenge the Judicial Review, Ruling.

Go to back to 60 website for the links

Interviews on Radio Ian Rothwell
Joanne Welch Interview
David Hencke Interview

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2021 5:21 pm
by Huegatort
Latest e-mail from back to 60

Official: The Department of Work and Pensions has never bothered to assess the impact of raising the pension age on the 3.8 million women themselves

It’s official. The Department for Work and Pensions has finally admitted after more than 25 years that they never thought of doing any impact studies on the effect of their decisions to raise the pension age from 60 to 66 for 3.8 million women.

A Freedom of Information request from a 1950s born woman seeking details of impact studies on the group of women most affected has forced the ministry to admit that there are none.

The letter says: “The Act does not oblige a public authority to create new information to answer questions; nor does it require a public authority to give advice, opinion or explanation, generate answers to questions, or create or obtain information it does not hold.
“If you ask a question, rather than requesting recorded information, we will provide you with the recorded information that best answers the question. Once we have provided the recorded information, we have met our obligations under the Act; interpreting the information provided is up to you.
“Your request makes statements and seeks to engage us in debate which you want us to
respond to. This would need new information to be created.”

No information held
It goes on : “We do not hold any recorded information of an impact assessment of the effects on women of the State Pension Age that informed the rises of 1995. However, you may find the following explanation useful. We have provided this outside our obligations under the FOI Act”.

The Department has released the White Paper that preceded the 1995 Pension Act and the impact statement the coalition government produced before implementing the 2011 Act which speeded up the rise. And guess what the ministry are right there is nothing about the impact on women before the government legislated for the change.

There is one concession – the idea of extending the auto credit of national insurance contributions to women. Men over 60 had this concession since 1983. Women would have had it once they started to raise their pension age from 60 in 2010 but of course this was never implemented and men continued to have it until 2018 when the pension age was equalised. Instead there is much concern repeated in the 2011 impact study of the effects of the change on business and occupational pensions. The 2011 impact study is more comprehensive but also concentrates on the savings the government will make.

So no wonder Sir James Eadie QC when acting for the DWP in last year’s Court of Appeal case brought by BackTo60 to seek restitution for the 3.8 million affected made it clear that pensions were not a social measure aimed to reduce poverty or inequality. The ministry never had the issue on their radar when they introduced the change in 1995. These women were not even thought important enough to require an study on how it would affect their lives.

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2021 4:33 am
by bowlingbun
Does this unequal treatment mean it contravenes the Equality Act come into play??

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2021 8:54 am
by Gozmos_2104
I bet that will be stopped for us too.

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Tue Jun 08, 2021 1:35 pm
by Huegatort
Hi Bowlingbun, I've read a lot on equality act 2010, HOWEVER we are still discriminated against. Here is an article you may find interesting; I certainly did!

HIGH COURT RULING ON WOMEN’S STATE PENSION AGE
October 3, 2019 Ros Altmann Comments 81 Comments

1950s women disappointed as High Court says Government did not discriminate against them.
Equalising pension AGE does not mean pension equality – women still get much lower pensions than men.
Many women have been pushed into poverty and did not know about the changes.
Government should help those in hardship – perhaps allowing early access to State Pension or Pension Credit for those hardest hit.
In a landmark ruling today, the High Court has dismissed the claim brought on behalf of 3.6million women whose state pension age has been increased sharply, often without their knowledge. The judges ruled that the Government was correcting a past inequality against men, rather than discriminating against women, and was entitled to change pension ages at short notice and without due warnings.

This may not be discrimination, but it has caused real hardship: It was always going to be difficult to prove that a policy intended to equalise men and women’s pension age was discriminatory. But many of those affected are suffering real hardship because successive Governments failed to properly inform women of the original 1995 Act changes, so they were expecting their State Pension at age 60 and had inadequate chances to prepare. That is perhaps more like maladministration than discrimination.

Equalising pension age, does not deliver equal pensions: They may start their State Pension at the same age, but this is far from pension equality as women generally have much worse pensions than men. Not only do older women have lower State Pensions, those in their early 60s are estimated to have just one third of the private pension wealth of men too.

Women lose out in pensions due to social norms and past disadvantage: Social norms caused women to lose out in pensions throughout their lives. When they were younger, they were often excluded from occupational schemes, were paid less than men and had to take time out for childcare. That meant their lifetime incomes are lower than men’s and the increase in divorce rates also means women have lost the husband’s pension they might previously have relied on.

State pensions are a state benefit, not a property right: The High Court concluded that Government can change State Pension rules, with Parliamentary approval, just as it can change other National Insurance benefits. Adjustments to social policy and controlling benefit expenditure are valid policy decisions. Of course, with an aging population, rising longevity and pay-as-you-go pensions, the Government needs to control state pension costs, to protect younger generations of taxpayers.

Increasing State Pension age saved huge sums to Exchequer: Estimates suggest the rise in women’s State Pension age between 2010 and 2016 saved over £5billion in public spending. There is a three-fold benefit for the Treasury. Firstly, not paying their pensions. Secondly, higher tax and national insurance receipts as women keep working while waiting for their State Pension. Thirdly, the additional should boost the economy.

But rising State Pension Ages have increased poverty: Many of the women waiting longer for their state pension have been pushed into poverty. Research from the Institute for Fiscal Studies found one in five women aged 60-62 were in income poverty when their state pension age was increased to 63 by 2016. The study showed that men have been affected by rising poverty too, as the starting age for receipt of means-tested Pension Credit has increased in line with rising women’s state pension ages.

Governments failed to properly inform people about their state pension age rising: Obviously, policy changes of such magnitude need to be communicated well in advance, so the women are given time to prepare for delays in starting pension receipt. Unfortunately, as the BackTo60 and WASPI campaigns highlight, the failure to communicate clearly and effectively has caused real problems for many of the women affected.

Continued rise in pension ages makes no allowance for those who cannot work: If older women can stay in work, they can probably manage without their state pension, but many are caring for loved ones, or in poor health, or facing ageism in the workplace so they are unable to do so. There is a stark cliff-edge between the benefits available to people below state pension age and those above it. Although this is designed to encourage more people to keep working, it makes no allowances for the significant minority of older people who genuinely cannot work. If they have no private pension or other savings, due to being disadvantaged throughout their lives by lower earnings and pension rights, then will be struggling.

I believe Government should help – perhaps with early access to state pension and pension credit if needed: Although it is not realistic to give all the 1950s-born women their State Pension back to age 60 – the cost would be over £150billion – I do believe Government has responsibility to help. As Pensions Minister, I proposed allowing early access to State Pension for those in poor health. This would finally recognise the significant differences in healthy life expectancy across the country, which mean some people genuinely cannot work. Also, those who are caring for others may need to retire. Yet, under current rules, even if they have paid decades of National Insurance, they cannot get a penny of their State Pension early. Another potential reform would see Government allowing people to claim Pension Credit before State Pension age, to help the poorest who would otherwise be in poverty. In light of the cost savings from increasing the State Pension Age, it should surely be possible to offer some mitigation for those worst affected. This could help both men and women.

I do hope the Government considers these proposals seriously.

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2021 3:46 pm
by sunnydisposition

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2021 4:00 pm
by sunnydisposition
Move the State Pension age back to 60 for both men & women
Move the pension age back to 60 for both men & women. With immediate/imminent effect. Back to what it was for women born in the 1950s & 1960s.

More details
Young people are struggling to find work, & losing their jobs, due to the pandemic. Why not allow older people to retire earlier, thereby freeing up jobs for younger people? There would be a cost, however, surely a far more positive cost than paying Universal Credit? Not to mention the option of restoring the balance back into young people's favour, & helping restore their future.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/581736

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2022 8:43 pm
by Huegatort
Below is an update about WASPI in todays Express

State pension scandal: WASPI women expect 'maximum compensation' after MPs' report
WASPI WOMEN are demanding the Government gives them the maximum possible compensation "without further ado" for their losses after the state pension age was increased from 60 to 66 for women.

This follows a new report from the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), which has backed claims that 3.8 million women born in the 1950s should receive compensation for Government “maladministration". The MPs said they deserve "top level" compensation for the way the Department for Work & Pensions managed the state pension age increase.

Campaigning groups such as Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) have been calling for compensation. The affected women have lost state pension averaging £50,000 each.

Last year, the Waspi campaign received a huge boost when the Parliamentary & Health Service Ombudsman ruled that the Department for Work & Pensions (DWP) should have given more notice of moves to raise their state retirement age.

The Ombudsman said the DWP should have informed affected women of changes in December 2006, but delayed until April 2009.

Now the all-party group of MPs said that 1950s women need to be given “fast and proper” compensation, in a report to the Ombudsman.

Last week they published a report strongly arguing for "top level" compensation.

Hilary Simpson, chair of Women Against State Pension Injustice (Waspi) 2018, said this confirms the injustice.

“We are delighted that the MPs’ report has come out so strongly in favour of the maximum compensation,” she said.

“They diligently sifted through mountains of evidence about the impact that the lack of notice had on women. They listened carefully as we gave our evidence and really seemed to understand our experience.”

The MPs concluded that not only has the maladministration impacted on women financially, it has also caused extraordinary emotional, physical and psychological distress, forcing women to endure a reduced quality of life.

This follows a new report from the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG), which has backed claims that 3.8 million women born in the 1950s should receive compensation for Government “maladministration". The MPs said they deserve "top level" compensation for the way the Department for Work & Pensions managed the state pension age increase.

Campaigning groups such as Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) have been calling for compensation. The affected women have lost state pension averaging £50,000 each.

Last year, the Waspi campaign received a huge boost when the Parliamentary & Health Service Ombudsman ruled that the Department for Work & Pensions (DWP) should have given more notice of moves to raise their state retirement age.

The Ombudsman said the DWP should have informed affected women of changes in December 2006, but delayed until April 2009.

Now the all-party group of MPs said that 1950s women need to be given “fast and proper” compensation, in a report to the Ombudsman.

Waspi women have been claiming long and hard for redress (Image: Getty)
Last week they published a report strongly arguing for "top level" compensation.

Hilary Simpson, chair of Women Against State Pension Injustice (Waspi) 2018, said this confirms the injustice.

“We are delighted that the MPs’ report has come out so strongly in favour of the maximum compensation,” she said.

“They diligently sifted through mountains of evidence about the impact that the lack of notice had on women. They listened carefully as we gave our evidence and really seemed to understand our experience.”

The MPs concluded that not only has the maladministration impacted on women financially, it has also caused extraordinary emotional, physical and psychological distress, forcing women to endure a reduced quality of life.

Simpson said: “The MPs were clear that the emotional impact on women has been profound and long-lasting to the detriment of their mental health

“We know of a nurse who gave up work due to serious ill-health, believing she would get her state pension at 60.

“She finally had to re-mortgage her house after her husband died. She felt deeply ashamed and became severely depressed.”

The MPs heard how women made irreversible life-changing decisions based on wrong information. Their report describes how many sacrificed their own physical wellbeing, exhausting themselves and exacerbating pre-existing conditions.

They drew a clear causal link between very serious physiological deterioration and DWP maladministration, Simpson said.

She is determined that 1950s women must get the compensation they deserve. “Despite these MPs’ different backgrounds and political perspectives they are absolutely united in calling for compensation at the highest level for us.

“They should now share the report with their fellow MPs across all parties and convince them that compensation must be forthcoming without further ado”.

The DWP spokesperson said the Government decided to equalise the state pension age for men and women more than 25 years ago, as a long-overdue move towards gender equality.

It insisted that it had been supported by both the High Court and Court of Appeal, which found it acted entirely lawfully and did not discriminate on any grounds.

Re: To complain to DWP re:WASPI site Pension Inequality

Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2022 1:38 pm
by sunnydisposition
It's a pity this petition reach 89,891 before it was closed. And if it had hit 100,000 at least it would have a got a mention and kept highlighting the issue. Yes, I know Waspi are about equalisation but anything that mentioned 1950's women. Has to be a positive!

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/581736