At this late stage , why not extend the Survey a little ?
Trussells ... 10 / 20 hard copies ... 6 branches across the country.
Only 10 come back ? That's 10 more from a new source that you would not have had before , or any other time in the past ?
At least then you will have had some input from those carers very near to the bottom of the economic / social pile ?
Apart from comparing their views with what's coming in online , vital if one is extrapolating the findings from , say , a couple of thousand to six million ???
As for the Trussells input , extrapolating those findings would probably be more accurate due to the common factors.
Exclude them as if they do not exist ?
How else are you going to take their views into account ???
After all , carers will expect the same picture we see in CarerLand.
Housing ? Conditions some of us have to survive/ live in ? Omitted ?
Perhaps Shelter may be able to provide some data for you ?
And in CarerLand , there are no " No go " areas ....... for carers.
Trussells ... 10 / 20 hard copies ... 6 branches across the country.
Only 10 come back ? That's 10 more from a new source that you would not have had before , or any other time in the past ?
At least then you will have had some input from those carers very near to the bottom of the economic / social pile ?
Apart from comparing their views with what's coming in online , vital if one is extrapolating the findings from , say , a couple of thousand to six million ???
As for the Trussells input , extrapolating those findings would probably be more accurate due to the common factors.
Exclude them as if they do not exist ?
How else are you going to take their views into account ???
After all , carers will expect the same picture we see in CarerLand.
Housing ? Conditions some of us have to survive/ live in ? Omitted ?
Perhaps Shelter may be able to provide some data for you ?
And in CarerLand , there are no " No go " areas ....... for carers.