Anyone else filled in one of these ?
Given that the " Big Two " issues are finance and support services , did anyone else considered that the questions asked were " Weak " ?
If whosoever needs this information , and given OUR needs , I would have expected to see at least a dozen or more on separate sections so as to ensure the root issues can be fully known , and policies adapted to fill those needs ?
Lack of financial resources ? Obvious to list the main reasons but , it also leads on to several other areas.
Respite breaks / leisure time / support services / isolation / depression ... just a few which could be cured by increasing the income of both the carer and caree.
Surveys ? Fine .... provided you ask the RIGHT questions , and extrapolate the results from a TRUE cross section of carers.
How many of our fellow carers have no Internet access ? Need food banks for food and / or energy ?
Just imagine if that survey had asked the question ... Have you ever used a food bank ? ... survey said " No ". There are several times as many carers using food banks than are members of our supporting organisations.
See the problem ?
One common factor would be ... you guessed it ... lack of money.
No wonder surveys , at best , are mere guides as opposed to a true picture , a picture of what ? That depends on what questions are asked in the first place ?
We , in Carerland , know differently ... we have to survive in Carerland.
Perhaps a survey designed by carers ?
How about if carers issue a challenge to an assortment of our " Peers " ? Each one attached to a carer , all with different issues , for a month , same rations as a carer , and then , at the end of the month , ask them to fill in the same survey and our survey.
Which survey would our peers find more revealing after a month in the trenches / gulag ????
After all , mummy does not know best ?
################################################################
As an aside , a little history.
2010-2011 ... CarerWatch , following invitations , an influx of disabled members , to add their experiences / visions to ours.
One of the first areas they explored was our take on surveys. Low and behold , almost to a poster , they were critical of the surveys being undertaken by some of their supporting organisations , even suggesting some were engineered to provide the " Correct " answers.
Suffice to say , it is not the supporting organisations in the firing line , it's the methods used to gain more insight which may just skate over the real issues for both carers and carees alike.
Be interesting to learn if the Roadshows ( Even with entry by invitation only ) provided anything new NOT already available though this Forum ???
Bottom line ? Neither carers / carees nor our supporting organisations are winners !