[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/session.php on line 585: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/phpbb/session.php on line 641: sizeof(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable
Sheltered Housing : Cases Of Abuse Not Uncommon - Carers UK Forum

Sheltered Housing : Cases Of Abuse Not Uncommon

Discuss news stories and political issues that affect carers.
Today's Independent ... similar reports available throughout the media :

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 73196.html

More than 30,000 instances of abuse in sheltered housing over last three years, finds investigation

'We have no doubt that these latest figures are the tip of an iceberg, and that many cases of abuse in sheltered housing go unreported'

More than 30,000 instances of abuse have taken place in sheltered housing against elderly or disabled people over the last three years, a BBC File on Four investigation has revealed.

And although data collected from local authorities shows that the instances of abuse have increased by 30 per cent from the period 2014/15 to 2016/17, it is believed that this could be the “tip of the iceberg” of a much larger problem.

This is despite many councils providing the BBC with either incomplete data or no data whatsoever.

Action on Elder Abuse (AEA), a specialist group, working to challenge and prevent the abuse of older people, has described the reports as “deeply troubling” and is calling for an immediate investigation.

The group also says that elderly people are subjected to a “postcode lottery” when it comes to councils investigating allegations of abuse.

Figures from the Crown Prosecution Service revealed that there were just 2,856 successful convictions for crimes against older people in 2016-17.

“These findings on abuse in sheltered accommodation are deeply troubling and should trigger an urgent investigation into what is happening, and what is being done about it,” AEA director Stephen McCarthy told the BBC.

“Sheltered housing is not regulated in the same way as residential homes, and most complexes no longer have dedicated managers living on site.

“And yet there is an increasing number of frail and very vulnerable older people living there, part of a government strategy to keep people at home for longer – but without the same protections.

“The fact that there were 7,200 reports of neglect says a lot about what is going wrong in this system, which seems to treat this type of accommodation as just ‘housing’ when it is so much more than that.

“It is ‘sheltered’ for a good reason.”

In 2007, the Department of Health commissioned the UK Study of Abuse and Neglect of Older People, and in 2013 the National Centre for Social Research and King’s College London collaborated on a similar study of their own.

The results of both gave a mid-range estimate of 8.6 per cent of people aged 65 or more experiencing some form of abuse in a given year – which includes physical, psychological, financial or sexual abuse, or neglect.

This translates to roughly 998,500 older people and is line with AEA’s own polling undertaken in early 2017, which estimated 9.3 per cent of older people experiencing abuse, equivalent to around 1,080,000 people.

“We have no doubt that these latest figures are the tip of an iceberg, and that many cases in sheltered housing go unreported,” added Mr McCarthy.

“This is the reality facing too many older people across the UK.

“It’s about time the governments of the UK got serious and made elder abuse an aggravated offence similar to hate crimes based on race, religion, sexual orientation or disability.

“How much longer must older people put up with this?

Does touch apon another question raised across several threads ... why do carers care in the first place , knowing the slave type conditions so many have to endure ?

For many , a decision needing to be made on several levels.

For most , no real option / alternative.

What doesn't assist is the System ... this article reveal just one element of it's systematic breakdown.

When a carer has to rely on the System , does he / she have to cross their fingers and hope all will be well with their caree ???
We need to go back to the days of CSCI, who were allowed to get involved in individual cases, who had strict rules about money management, who would check that their rules were being followed. Simple!
Only one problem.

The Commission of Social Care inspectorate are not on the ground to prevent mental and physical abuse in either sheltered accomodation or care homes.

The Authoirites and / or police will only act IF they are called in ... many cases go unreported.

A grass roots community care scheme ... run by family members of those in sheltered accomodation ... would be more appropriate ???

Even extend to care homes ... now that would be somewhat " Revolutionary " ... oh dear , that word will probably be flagged up somewhere ???
At least with CSCI if you complained something could happen very quickly, whereas generally CQC wait for "trends to emerge" so in my son's case, he's a one off, for this company, so they are unlikely to do anything at all.
Reaction as opposed to preventative action.

Employing paid workers as opposed to volunteers with an interest in the carees without a monetary consideration.

Lateral thinking for any grass roots community to take the initiative , and provide a better service free of outside constraints.

A new world for the carees who would appreciate genuine assistance from local people who would " Care. "

There are many areas for grass roots communities to take over the reigns of " Institutionalized " social care from the System.

Slowly but surely , several LAs are engaging more with both carers and carees to decentralise social care as they see the same advantages if not lesser costs.
It might work for the group of "sweet little old ladies" but not everyone is sweet, some have age related mental degeneration, some incontinent, etc.
Long ago, there was a scheme in our area for carers who would care for disabled children in their own homes, rather than in Southampton, 20 miles away. My son was put on this scheme. No matter how much I explained about his poor concentration and hyperactivity, placement after placement broke down, 14 in all, every single carer.
Neither of us could cope with any more rejection. A community scheme would never work long term, in my view, as those with the most difficult needs would be back of the queue for help.