Said Act is a classic example of the Central Government seemingly benefiting certain sections of the community whereas , when one examines the precise wording , there is enough leeway for those applying the changes to be able to change the goal posts thus blunting the published intention of the Act.
Done for mainly political reasons .... need to pacify , seem to be acting , allow enough loopholes for purposes of said Act to be questionable but , not by those passing the Act , but by those applying the Act.
Put another way , the Govermnent needed a few " Patsies " ... step in the LAs ... the Lee Harvey Oswalds.
Not quite a chocolate teapot but , just turn the heat up a little.
Was not said Act " Welcomed " by our main carer organisations ?
Done for mainly political reasons .... need to pacify , seem to be acting , allow enough loopholes for purposes of said Act to be questionable but , not by those passing the Act , but by those applying the Act.
Put another way , the Govermnent needed a few " Patsies " ... step in the LAs ... the Lee Harvey Oswalds.
Not quite a chocolate teapot but , just turn the heat up a little.
Was not said Act " Welcomed " by our main carer organisations ?