American Husband / Carer For Wife Faces Deportation & Other Cases

Discuss news stories and political issues that affect carers.
An interesting one from today's Independent :

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 21766.html
American man living in UK to care for disabled British wife ordered to leave country.

'It feels like we’re being divorced without our consent'


Make what you will of this one.

Technically , said husband is in breach of UK Law but ..... ?

Cases like this one open up a whole hornets' nest as to the Right of Residency witin the UK.

.... and yet , we are actively encouraging foreign born people to work in the NHS and social care sector ?

Difficult one under the present legislation.

I will assume that our own supporting organisations will keep a low profile on this one ???

Even holding his coat whilst he fights his corner maybe a little too optimistic ?

Disability Rights movement might just have something to say .... on behalf of the caree ?

Perhaps our Government are missing a trick here ?

Why not encourage UK disabled people to marry foreign based spouses , allow them UK residency , and " Pay " them as carers thus saving the taxpayers even more ???

Our Lord Kitch would be smiling .... more cannon fodder !
More on this story from the International Business Times :

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/american-man-o ... fe-1637508

According to The Independent, Sandra was born in the UK and lived and worked in the country until 2002, when she traveled to the US and met Dale. The couple married several years later.

She said that she feels as though the couple is being forced to divorce without their consent. "The prospect of him having to leave has made me really depressed," she said. "It feels like we're being divorced without our consent, like someone is unofficially divorcing us."

Dale added that traveling back to the US would present a financial hardship as well. After airfare and rent back in the US, it would take up to a year before he could reapply for the visa.

Despite arguments by their lawyer, a judge said there was "insufficient supporting evidence about how this would impact on his wife if they had to live apart". The judge then claimed the public interest in maintaining effective immigration control was "justified and was proportionate".

The Home Office has declined to comment.


This one will have no " Happy " or logical outcome ?
True!!
A victory for a carer ?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/201 ... e-leave-uk

Home Office reverses decision to make stroke victim's wife leave UK,

Leah Waterman was earlier told she must return to Philippines, leaving severely disabled husband to care for children

The wife of a British stroke victim told by the Home Office that he must become the sole carer for their two young children has been told she will receive a right to remain visa after the Guardian highlighted their plight.

The Home Office had previously insisted Leah Waterman had to return to the Philippines, leaving her husband, Simon – who uses a wheelchair, requires 24-hour supervision to keep him alive and cannot speak, write or reliably understand what is said to him – as the sole carer for their two young British children.

Three days after the Guardian broke the story, Leah Waterman was told she would not have to return home to apply for a visa to care for her family in the UK.

The Home Office’s U-turn comes after it previously insisted there were “no exceptional circumstances” preventing her following the conventional route of applying for her visa from outside the UK.

Simon Waterman was living with his wife and their children, Kimi and Bryce, aged 10 and seven, in the Philippines when he had a severe stroke in September 2015.

The family moved back to Abergavenny in south Wales in December so Simon could be near his family. However, they were refused a visa for Leah to remain in the country.

The decision was made despite unequivocal evidence from multiple medical sources detailing the extent of Simon’s disabilities, his repeated life-threatening seizures – some lasting as long as seven hours – the risk of sudden death and the impossibility of him looking after himself, let alone his children.

“I’m totally overwhelmed,” Leah Waterman said. “I can smile now and I think I will get my first good night’s sleep tonight for many months. I will tell my children when they get home tonight. They will be so happy. We have tried to hide this situation from them but they have guessed something is wrong and have been increasingly upset about it. Simon too can now concentrate on getting better instead of desperately worrying about me having to go back to the Philippines.

“It’s great that the Home Office’s decision has been revised,” she added. “But I wish they hadn’t made the wrong decision in the first place when our exceptional circumstances were so clear right from day one.”

Simon, a former soldier in the British army, requires 24-hour care from Leah and medical experts. His stroke caused major brain injury, resulting in paralysis on the right side of his body and significant weakness on the left. He struggles to walk outdoors, risks falling whenever he stands up and would be unable to get himself off the floor if he did fall. He cannot do even gentle exercise for more than three minutes without requiring a rest.

Since his stroke, Simon has had regular post-stroke seizures, lasting between 30 minutes and seven hours. They can happen at any time and have led to him being admitted to hospital at least five times during the past 12 months.

Despite extensive medical evidence submitted with her visa application, the Home Office rejected Leah Waterman’s application for leave to remain in the UK because she had entered on a visitor’s visa. It said it would not even consider her request for a change of immigration status, because she did not have the right clearance when she entered the country.

Leah Waterman, however, explained in her application that the family had arranged her visitor’s visa before her husband’s stroke so they could visit his parents and sister for Christmas in 2015.

She sought legal advice after Simon’s stroke and was told that she could not apply for a right to remain visa until her visitor’s visa expired in June 2016, by which time the family feared Simon might have died.

Leah Waterman was told, however, that the change in her husband’s health would qualify her to claim exceptional circumstances and apply for the new visa from inside the UK, which she did in July 2016.

In its refusal letter of August 2017, the Home Office dismissed that advice: “We have considered … whether there are exceptional circumstances in your case [for example, whether you returning home to reapply for your visa] would result in unjustifiably harsh conditions for you, your partner [or] a relevant child,” the letter stated.

“In so doing, we have taken into account the best interests of any relevant child as a primary consideration. Based on the information you have provided, we have decided that there are no such exceptional circumstances in your case.

“The option is available to you to return to the Philippines and apply for the correct entry clearance,” the letter continues. “During this time, your children can remain in the UK under the care of their father.”

Shah Williams, Simon’s sister, said: “I still can’t quite believe it. It’s such a relief and takes so much pressure off Leah and Simon. They can now start to move forward as best they can in the circumstances. The family can now look for some joy in the very changed life that we all now face after Simon’s stroke rather than focusing on the fear that Leah might be taken from us at any time.”


More a victory for common sense ?

Or , based on less cost to the taxpayer in the long run ?

Nothing more on the fate of our carer in the first posting ... as I type.
At last , more on Dale McIntier and his disabled wife :


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho ... 24836.html

Stop ‘inhumane’ deportation of husband who cares for disabled British wife, Home Office urged.

More than 13,000 people back calls for Government to allow American national Dale McIntier, 62, to stay in UK with disabled wife Sandra.

The Home Office has been urged not to deport an American man whose disabled British wife of seven years is reliant on him to provide her care.

Dale McIntier, 62, came to the UK on a visitor’s visa with his wife Sandra in April 2015, and has been told he must return to the US in order to reapply for a spousal visa, or face deportation.

If he goes back to the US, Ms McIntier would be left without a carer and having to rely on state support, which the couple and their supporters warn would have “devastating affects” on her.

A petition created after The Independent reported on the case in August calls on the Home Office to stop the “inhumane” deportation of Mr McIntier. It has so far garnered more than 13,400 signatures.

It states: “Sandra McIntier is severely disabled and requires round the clock physical and mental care. If her husband was deported it would have devastating affects on her.

“Dale McIntier would suffer extreme mental health issues if he had to leave his wife without the love and stability that she needs.

“It would hurt our Government purse to deport Dale. Tax payers would have to pay for his flight home and also round the clock care for Sandra. It makes no sense to deport a beloved husband who is a wonderful part of the community.”

The couple initially came to the UK on a visitor’s visa to medical treatment, with a plan to stay for six months and then return to their home in Idaho. But this plan changed after five months when Ms McIntier, who already suffered from a genetic bone condition, was diagnosed with a fast-growing cancer which led to her requiring round-the-clock care.

They decided that it would be best to stay in the UK for the foreseeable future to ensure her health needs could be met, so Mr McIntier applied for a spousal visa before his visitor status ran out in October.

However, five months later he received a letter from the Home Office giving him five days to leave of the country. It stated that the couple had failed to provide relevant paperwork from a doctor stating Ms McIntier's inability to travel, a requirement they say they had not been aware of.

After mounting an appeal against the decision, the couple were told by a court in a first-tier tribunal that Mr McIntier must return to the US in order to reapply for a spousal visa.

The couple's solicitor, who did not want to be named while the appeal is still ongoing, told The Independent the judge had not applied the law in the right way.

Under immigration law, spousal visa applications must be submitted from outside the UK. But the solicitor said the "compelling circumstances" of the case mean the Home Office should allow the appeal to take place outside such laws, allowing him to stay in the UK to care for his elderly wife.

Speaking to The Independent, Mr McIntier said: “We just hope this petition will make a difference. We’re lucky to have so many people here who support us.

"Since the weather’s turned colder Sandra has been in more pain. She really can’t travel much. We can hardly take a day out without it wiping her out for sometimes days afterwards.

"She goes into depression really easily. She has no intention of going back to the States. Ever since we got married we’ve just needed each other. If I do have to leave, we’ll probably both be in depression.

"It takes a certain amount to run a household. She would need someone to come in and take care of her. She needs me here pretty much 24 hours a day."

The couple is currently awaiting a decision on their appeal. The Home Office said it would not comment on ongoing cases
Image


Money ... always seems to be the number one consideration ... ?

If so , what is cheaper for the taxpayer ... allowing a foreign born citizen to remain ... and to care under the terms and conditions most of us endour ... our Lord Kitch , take another bow ... OR ... allow the Authorities to care for the disabled wife ?

As for the wife's preferences ???